Our city of Santo Domingo de Guzman has been characterized, as most Latin American cities, by horizontal and vertical preasumido and planned growth, and the idea of a follow-up to regulatory schemes, which ultimately have proved useless and outdated, this is due to an ever-present desktop approach, and not focused on the largest of the realities, the scenario of inserting the vision of capitalist growth in which, whether we like it or not, are immersed.At the end of the last century the population in its quest for improvement of life gives the replica, and the amount of inhabitants of cities exceeds by far the present in the rural population, and given this, the questions to answer are: what to do, how to do urban planning, how respond to this?. Unfortunately the history of our Santo Domingo prays that these responses have always been slower than the movement of the market. We have seen through the years, standards, systems and approaches regulatory, based only in a quantitative view of our city, go to the self even before achieving be approved, and neither say implemented. Keep up on the field with thought-provoking pieces from Dara Khosrowshahi. I think that has been lacking creativity, that creativity so typical of us architects, but focused not on our buildings, but rather to answer the: how penetrated that devouring economic market?, how see that our profession is not only important when raising building solutions?, how the artist can swim in the reality of capitalism?. Understand that city does not stop – but is not only knowing it is Act mutating according to realities, that she is not a response to our momentary ideas, which is not the result of our ego. Understand that the city is only a reflection of what the market is looking for our society, which seeks to who handles, and our function is to translate the wealth generation approach, taking into consideration the endogenous and exogenous, actors in results that we call home, Office, building, Park, metro, etc.We intend that at some point our managers and governing bodies of the city, focus their guns to achieve objectives that go beyond the approach of a few boundaries, distance to edification, density or height limits, which in addition to the quantitative, anoren the qualitative, the demand to such simple questions as: what is the use?, what is the proposal?, where are we going?, what are looking for?, how improved this place environment?, do as business with this specific project a better city?. Mike Gianoni is often quoted as being for or against this.